The follow-up, the change orders, the draw requests and the selections chasing — configured for remodeling on day one, so the office work stops happening at 9pm.
Change orders are not paperwork, they are the margin mechanic of this trade. They commonly run ~10–15% of contract value on a major project, and the most common source of all — an allowance that quietly ran over — is the one most often absorbed without anyone logging it.
Not a projection or a guarantee. It is what eight unsigned changes on one job can add up to when nothing gates them.
An approval still sitting unsigned after a couple of days is an escalation, not a to-do. Priced before it’s built, a change is a decision. Priced after, it’s a dispute.
This kit was designed against how design-build remodelers really operate — a sales side that ends in two separate contracts, a production side measured in months, and a change-order process that decides whether the job keeps its margin.
Scoping a remodel is expensive. The phone screen exists so the truck only rolls for a real budget range with both decision-makers present — and so the rest go to a long-cycle track instead of the bin.
Most remodeling sales need several contacts after the first meeting. A five-day drip is finished long before the customer is.
Priced before it’s built, a change is a decision. Priced after, it’s a dispute. The gate is a signature, not a notification.
A one-week delay on a selection can widen to two or three weeks at the finish end, because it moves cabinets, then countertop templating, then trim-out, then final inspection.
Progress billing is a blocked chain, not an invoice. One missing subcontractor waiver holds the whole cycle.
On a remodel the customer is standing in it. Silence reads as chaos, so the build narrates itself.
Not a blank CRM you have to design. Sales and design are one board because they are one conversation; production is its own board because it runs on inspections; and change orders get a board of their own, because they are where the margin goes.
Work is released on the signature, not on the conversation. An approval still sitting unsigned after a couple of days is an escalation, not a to-do.
We went looking for a ready-made contractor system that carried a job past the signature — a production board that runs on inspections, selections deadlines tied to the schedule, draws blocked on lien waivers, and change orders gated by a signature. Every published one we found ends at won. That gap is the reason this build exists.
Request, priced, sent, signed, released — and only then does the crew touch it. Change orders commonly run ~10–15% of contract value on a major project, and an allowance overage automatically becomes one instead of a conversation nobody logs.
Every selection carries a deadline and an owner. Reminders escalate to the client, then to you, with the schedule consequence stated in writing — so a late tile pick becomes a flagged decision instead of a surprise at the finish end. Your scheduling software still owns the schedule; this owns the chasing.
Each draw request fires off its milestone, and the waiver status for each subcontractor is tracked and chased — so a missing conditional waiver surfaces while you can still fix it, instead of when the lender declines the release. The waivers themselves stay with whoever issues them.
Plan review is a stage owned by the jurisdiction. The follow-up aims at the permit office; the homeowner gets told where it stands so the silence doesn’t read as a stall.
Not at substantial completion. The gap between the two is exactly where a five-star becomes a three-star, and the request is suppressed while a punch item or warranty callback is open.
Consent capture, STOP and quiet-hours handling, and a lead-safe gate that keys off the year the property was built — on by default, not a setting you have to discover.
Plenty of contractors quote the job off one estimate. The strongest design-build shops don’t: they sell a small paid design agreement first, do the discovery, drawings and selections against it, and only then present the construction contract — because you cannot price a remodel accurately until that work is done. Two signatures, weeks apart, each with its own close rate. If you work that way, these boards already do. If you don’t, the design stages simply sit unused and nothing breaks.
~4–8% of projected job cost
A real contract sale with its own cadence — not a proposal reminder. It is priced, signed and paid before drawings begin, and the fee is commonly credited back against the construction contract on signing. That credit is the close mechanic, so it belongs on the proposal as a line item.
the build + deposit
Different objection, different close rate, different money. The follow-up cadence has to match a decision cycle measured in weeks, not one that exhausts itself in five days — remodeling has the longest consideration window of the home trades.
Both events are stages you can see, with their own follow-up. So “we close ~~70% of design agreements and ~~55% of construction proposals” becomes a sentence you can actually say about your own business. Illustrative figures.
They are the highest-intent contacts in your database and almost nobody works them. Known scope. Known budget gap. They already paid you once and already trust you. When a single board collapses both contracts into “won or lost”, this segment does not exist as something you can select — which is exactly why it never gets a campaign.
Signing a design agreement and then not signing a construction agreement is a state the boards can see. That state has its own re-engagement track, written for someone who already knows what the project costs.
Proposals age. Past your re-quote window — or the moment you flag a material escalation — the proposal is marked for re-quote instead of going back out at a number you can no longer build for.
An unsold construction proposal goes to a cadence built for a months-long decision, not a week-long one.
Remodeling clients don’t come back on a cycle, they come back for the next room. A kitchen client is a bath prospect, and the campaign says so.
Boards, fields and forms go live. Your project inquiry form asks project type, budget range, year built and HOA — so qualification branches before anyone drives anywhere.
Speed-to-lead and missed-call text-back switch on. Contractors average around ~42 minutes to first response; yours stops being a number you hope about.
Both follow-up cadences load — design agreement and construction proposal — along with the re-engagement track for everyone who paid for design and never built.
Production side: permit narration, selections watch, draw requests and the change-order signature gate.
Payments connected, review and referral flows tested against a real punch list, and your back catalogue segmented by room for phase-two work.
A design retainer, a construction deposit, a signed change order and five progress draws are all payment events. They run on Square rails, which means the deposit link goes out with the signature instead of a week later, and card acceptance on a six-figure remodel stops being a conversation about ~3%.
The agreement and the payment are one moment, not two.
Milestone-triggered, with the waiver chase attached.
Approved work is logged against the job and carried into the next draw request, instead of living in somebody’s memory.
The customer sees both prices and chooses, with the cost in plain sight — a cash-discount mechanic printed on the invoice, not a surprise at the end.
The stage names above are the first test — they are the boards your account actually opens with. The second is the part you can’t buy: a production board, selections tied to the schedule, waiver-blocked draws and a change-order signature gate. Every published competitor we could inspect stops at won.
You shouldn’t. Project management stays where it is. What this owns is everything before the contract and everything about getting paid — intake, qualification, both follow-up cadences, the re-engagement segment and the payment events. Where a construction-management tool is authoritative, it stays authoritative.
Then it costs them nothing — check customers pay the cash price, the price they pay today. What changes is speed: the retainer invoice fires on signature instead of on memory, draws go out on milestones, and the deposit clears next day. And the homeowner who wanted to put a $40,000 kitchen on a card and got told no stops being a no.
Then the sales board runs as one conversion and the design stages sit unused — nothing breaks. The letter of intent works the same slot if a client arrives with finished drawings. The reason the two-contract shape is the default is that it is what the strongest design-build operators do, not because it is required.
It will get built either way. The only question is whether it gets invoiced. Board now and the next one goes out with a signature line on it.
Automate With Us provides software and configuration services. Figures shown are published industry research or illustrative examples — they are not projections, guarantees, or representations of the results you should expect. Individual results depend on your market, pricing, capacity and execution. Processing costs vary by card mix and volume; the ~3% figure is illustrative and your effective rate will differ. Payment processing is provided through Square and is subject to Square’s approval and terms. Text-message and email sending are subject to carrier and regulatory registration. Permitting, licensing, lien and lead-safe obligations remain yours; the compliance rails in this kit assist with process and are not legal advice. Terms · Privacy